Negligence - Legal Causation

o prove a case of negligence, a party must be able to demonstrate causality, both legal and factual. In other words, the party must not only be able to demonstrate that the actions were part of something, but also that the actions were sufficient legal cause to hold someone responsible and neglect. Factual and legal causation is said to differ with each other in an effort to avoid the danger of an accused to be exposed to liability in an indeterminate amount for an indeterminate time to an indeterminate class, as Judge Cardio.

Once a party has shown that the actions of the other party caused your injury, the question becomes a legal causation. One key factor effecting the legal causation is the remoteness of damage to the person of the negligence of another. The negligence of a person is too far or not a Elements of Negligence of injury or other damages if a reasonable person would not reasonably be expected to arrive. The idea of illegal causation is to prevent damage by negligence gave to events where no one could foresee something bad happening and to take the necessary preventive measures.

In medical negligence cases, the immediate cause is a bit easier to prove, especially in surgical errors. If of failure to diagnose or missed diagnosis, the question of proximate cause is not so easy to prove, because it is not so easy to know what the real damage. Surgical errors are much easier, at least one person has undergone many surgeries with several doctors in a very limited period of time.


In cases of medical malpractice, it is generally more difficult to prove that there has been a violation of the doctor who made WA mistake was negligent in terms of cause factual and legal. Determining the offense is more difficult, because the error was committed was not necessarily a huge mistake, or even can be identified as an error when it was committed. Causality is much easier to prove, because there are usually very few surgeons capable of making a mistake in one person at a time. Damage also usually something simple to show for the same reason. Depending on the case, including surgery, it is easy to say I wowed not have feet because the doctor amputated the wrong. Damage in the case is clear, Clinical Negligence.

No comments:

Post a Comment